You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The given line graph presents how many inquiries the Tourist Information Office in one city obtained from January to June in 2011.
Overall, the number of inquiries obtained directly and by telephone showed upward trends while that by letter or email fell down over the course of six months starting from January in 2011. The majority number of enquiries received in person compared to the least number of those obtained via letter or email.
In January, the most number of inquiries received by telephone stood at nearly 900, followed by those obtained by letter or email and in person at 750 and 450, respectively. In the next three months, it can be seen that there was a slight fluctuation in the number of enquiries received by telephone around 900 while the number of inquiries obtained by letter or email witnessed a slight decrease to 750 and then remained unchanged until March. Meanwhile, there was a dramatic rise in the number of inquiries obtained directly to 800 in March.
In the last half of the six-month period, it can be seen from the graph, there was a soar in the number of inquiries received in person from 800 to 1900, followed by a remarkable increase from 1000 to 1600 in the number of enquiries obtained by telephone. Meanwhile, there was a reverse trend seen in those received by letter or email decreasing from 700 to around 390.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in wh 73
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 67
- The table shows the average length of YouTube video advertisements and the average length of time viewers spend watching them Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 67
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 71
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79237288136 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54720938267 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436440677966 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.4490388452 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.375 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178486210273 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924383731622 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607510973131 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136018168273 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532967239027 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.