The given line graph illustrates three countries, namely Japan, Sweden, and the USA in term of the percentage of 65 and over year old people between 1990 and 2040.
From basic observation, all of lines improved remarkably, by contrast the most changes is Japan, the second is Sweden and the least is the USA.
Starting at 10, the percentage of the USA is the most, following by more than 5% is the proportion the Sweden and the last is Japan with 5% in 1940. There was a significant growth of six in ten in the ratio of the USA in 2000. The rate of the Sweden people experienced a remarkable rise of 5% between 1990 to 2000. A slight oscillations of 2% was seen witnessed in the of Japanese the from 1940 to 2000.
Over the period of prediction, there will be a dramatic boom to one in ten in the ratio of the USA people from 2000 to 2040. It is expected that the rate Sweden people will improve noticeably to 10% between 2000 to 2040. Estimations show that more the percentage of the Japanese people will upsurge to more 20% from 2000 to 2040.
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 56
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 78
- The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012 73
- Pop stars earn much more than classical music performers Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- WORKING AGE ADULTS IN FOUR COUNTRIES 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...A is the most, following by more than 5% is the proportion the Sweden and the las...
^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1940. There was a significant growth of six in ten in the ratio of the USA in 20...
^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'oscillation'?
Suggestion: oscillation
...se of 5% between 1990 to 2000. A slight oscillations of 2% was seen witnessed in the of Japa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[3]
Message: Did you mean 'form'?
Suggestion: form
...s seen witnessed in the of Japanese the from 1940 to 2000. Over the period of predi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35714285714 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50345450624 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469387755102 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1661904723 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8888888889 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.11111111111 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105853742521 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049179618825 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040631199646 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702147265693 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514794834835 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.