The bar chart compares three teams, namely A,B and C, in term of the scores over four different seasons over a 3-year-period starting in 2002.
It is clear that the scores of team B was by far highest during research period. While this figures of team C was steadly change, team A and B had a dramtically change from 2002 to 2005.
In 2002, team B had the highest scores, at 82 point. By constract, team A stood at 5 point which was the lowest scores. The scores of team C was doubl team A, at 10 point. After 2 years, although team B's point dropped to 43 point and team C'point fell to 12 point, after rise to 15 point in 2003, team A's point jumped noticeably to 35 pt.
In 2005, the scores of team B rose to 55 point whereas either the scores of team A or the scores of team C went down to 8 point and 5 point relatively.
- The graph shows the amount spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 78
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 73
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph shows the amount spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 61
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , B
...bar chart compares three teams, namely A,B and C, in term of the scores over four ...
^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...r highest during research period. While this figures of team C was steadly change, t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 672.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.09756097561 4.92477711251 83% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27928101629 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 170.1 283.868780488 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.0 1.45097560976 69% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0958234635 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151030370068 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894636679472 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041171817673 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112600535991 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335827912885 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 101.94 61.2550243902 166% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.0 10.3012195122 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.5 11.4140731707 57% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.