You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The pie graph illustrates how many percentage of local authorities spending in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
Overall, local authorities spent the highest for higher education in all three years, while environment and other are the least spending in Someland.
A glance to the chart provided reveals that local authorities prefered higher education, becoming the first rank in 1980 with 35%. It did not stop and gradually rose to 45%. Although there was a slight decrease to 40% from local government, it was still the dominating feature in all three years.
Beside, K-2 education always held second rank in 1980 and 1990, with 25% and 20% respectively. Meanwhile, local authorities did not show interest in health and human resources in 1980 which stood at 14%, but health and human resources steadily jumped to second position that was sam with K-12 education. However, transportation gained more money from local government in 2000, which sharply increased to 22% from 6% in 1990.
- Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.You should write at least 150 words. 11
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.You should wr 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 78
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should spen 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun percentage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many percentages'.
Suggestion: many percentages
The pie graph illustrates how many percentage of local authorities spending in Somel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...how many percentage of local authorities spending in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19875776398 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7118185982 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645962732919 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9841946044 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.625 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231148817539 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10002119744 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081584177969 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161144169139 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760542076471 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.