The bar chart below shows the employment of all male and female workers by occupation in the UK in the year 2005.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph compared occupations were selected by English citizens in the two sexes in the year of 2005.
Overall, there were two preference trends on occupations that were chosen as white color workers accounted for almost three-quarters of all people while the rest of the list was separated into blue color workers or the other career.
Looking first at the white color workers trends, the proportion of skilled trades shared the biggest gap in both genders with about 18 percent. Besides, the total of men interested in managers and senior officials was higher than the women, which was nearly equal to 6 percent. Next, a similar pattern was seen on professional and associate professional and technical by both genders due to the difference in their choices, in the range of 10 to 15 percent. In detail, administrative and secretarial attracted more women than men, especially the percentage of females in this aspect reached a peak of roughly 22 percent. Furthermore, the percentage of men in sales and customer service were similar to Administrative and secretarial since the figures for women who passionate about administrative and secretarial as their occupation was almost exactly half of the time as that of sales and customer service.
Turning to blue color workers trends, the share of process, plant and machine operatives that men were the dominant genre, accounting for above 10 percent while the percentage of the females was about 4 percent. On the other hand, the proportions for both sexes in Elementary were relatively evenly distributed at about 12 or 13 percent. Finally, there was nearly 15 percent in the percentage of men in personal service and the number of women made up only 3 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | Le Hoang Anh | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.48453608247 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 5.05154639175 238% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 26.3917525773 182% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 937.175257732 155% => OK
No of words: 284.0 206.0 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12676056338 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.78020617076 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86399022206 2.54303337028 113% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 127.690721649 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514084507042 0.622605031667 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 290.88556701 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 16.3608247423 171% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.8724419346 44.8134815571 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.6 76.5299724578 190% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 16.8248392259 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 4.34317383033 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0734162634648 0.216113520407 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368351674508 0.0766984524023 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533750712209 0.0603063233224 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07662463472 0.12726935374 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639902212822 0.0580467560999 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 8.37731958763 202% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 70.7449484536 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 7.45979381443 190% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 8.71597938144 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 41.2886597938 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 8.54432989691 154% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.