The bar chart below shows US seafood imports for 1986, 1996, and2016, and the forecast for 2026. The pie chart shows thegeographical structure of these imports in 2016.
The follwoing bar graph present numbers about USA sea food imports during thirty years, since 1986 from 2016 and one prediction for 2026. The pie graph splits this market by abroad contries thar sell seafood to America.
Overall, the seafood market was showed a massive growth over the last three decade. This market grow three time between 1986 and 2006, but in the future the prediction suggests a small decrease. The international suppliers had your piece on seafood market detailed in pie chart and we could observe that three contries represents more than 65% over all US seafood imports.
In regard of US seafood imports is vital to observe how expessive was your growth during the last 30 years. Since 1996 this market is increasing more than four billion each decade and totalize amounts near 18 billon over three decades. But, the predictions describes a slight decease in the seafood imports to 2006, this imports will be represent values around 17 billon in 2026 contrating with tuwenty billion achieved in 2016.
Futhermore, the pie chart reflect how is the seafood imports by contry of origens in 2016. Asain countries are bigger seafood supplier with more than 50% of this market, they are presented by China with 25% and Thailand with 28%. The third representative player in this market is Canada, the canadians had 15% of this marker when this research wad realized in 2016.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-30 | leandro_bsb | 62 | view |
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent per week on fast food Britain The chart shows the trends in consumption of fast food 73
- The graphs below show the growth in wages within the G7 Nations between 2000 2007 and 2008 2012 73
- In education and employment some people work harder than others Why do some people work harder Is it always a good thing to work hard 56
- The graph below shows the reasons for the use of social media by business by size of business in 2012 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... contries thar sell seafood to America. Overall, the seafood market was showed a...
^^^
Line 2, column 97, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'grows'.
Suggestion: grows
...over the last three decade. This market grow three time between 1986 and 2006, but i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'billon' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'billons'.
Suggestion: billons
...ach decade and totalize amounts near 18 billon over three decades. But, the prediction...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'billon' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'billons'.
Suggestion: billons
...orts will be represent values around 17 billon in 2026 contrating with tuwenty billion...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hen this research wad realized in 2016.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 32.9175257732 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 937.175257732 124% => OK
No of words: 234.0 206.0 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96581196581 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35240010452 2.54303337028 93% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 127.690721649 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594017094017 0.622605031667 95% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 290.88556701 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.4879904837 44.8134815571 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.636363636 76.5299724578 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 16.8248392259 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.909090909091 4.34317383033 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 2.54639175258 196% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240658784043 0.216113520407 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970168722969 0.0766984524023 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759952761375 0.0603063233224 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147319017375 0.12726935374 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289135318812 0.0580467560999 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 8.37731958763 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 70.7449484536 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 8.71597938144 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 7.59969072165 112% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 41.2886597938 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.