The chart below show the average annual spending for Canadian households in the year 1972 and the year 2002.
The pie charts below indicate the percentage of spending households in Canadian between 1972 and 2002. Overall,it is clear that there were significant differences between the percentage of spending households in both years.However,the proportion of petrol was similar in 1972 and 2000.
Firstly,the spending household for foods made up the highest in 1972 with nearly 40% compared with 14% in 2000.There was a sharp increase in expenditure for cars from 22% to 40%.Besides,the proportion of petrol in 1972 recorded an as small perentage of spending household as that in 2000,10% and 9% respectively.
Finally,the percentage of furniture in 1972 was slightly higher than in 2002,11 and 9% each group.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... Canadian between 1972 and 2002. Overall,it is clear that there were significant di...
^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...ge of spending households in both years.However,the proportion of petrol was similar in...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...pending households in both years.However,the proportion of petrol was similar in 197...
^^^^
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... was similar in 1972 and 2000. Firstly,the spending household for foods made up th...
^^^^
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...th nearly 40% compared with 14% in 2000.There was a sharp increase in expenditure for...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 179, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Besides
...in expenditure for cars from 22% to 40%.Besides,the proportion of petrol in 1972 record...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...nditure for cars from 22% to 40%.Besides,the proportion of petrol in 1972 recorded a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... 2000,10% and 9% respectively. Finally,the percentage of furniture in 1972 was sli...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, firstly, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 26.3917525773 91% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 593.0 937.175257732 63% => OK
No of words: 109.0 206.0 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44036697248 4.54256449028 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.231146315 3.78020617076 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31833733667 2.54303337028 130% => OK
Unique words: 68.0 127.690721649 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623853211009 0.622605031667 100% => OK
syllable_count: 162.9 290.88556701 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 12.6804123711 32% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 16.3608247423 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.6991926145 44.8134815571 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.25 76.5299724578 194% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 16.8248392259 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 4.34317383033 259% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 2.54639175258 314% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257952641771 0.216113520407 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178479783188 0.0766984524023 233% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120143095566 0.0603063233224 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1657240334 0.12726935374 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073975565975 0.0580467560999 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 8.37731958763 212% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 70.7449484536 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 7.45979381443 169% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 8.71597938144 167% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 41.2886597938 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 8.54432989691 150% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.