The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
The chart demonstrates percentage change in average house prices in various cities during the period of 1990 to 2002 in comparison with one single year 1989.
Overall, the average cost of house in the first half of the studied period was considerately low compared to the marker year. In contrast, prices soared up in the second half of the period in all cities.
Looking into details, what stands out from the graph is the cost of house in London, despite a rock bottom during 1990 and 1995 which was cheapest among cities with approximately -8%, the figure skyrocketed in the next six years to almost reach 12%. The next thrust went to New York as the average amount relatively inexpensive with -5% in a half of the decade after 1989. However, it witnessed a jump in the following period when hitting exactly 5%.
Regarding to Madrid and Tokyo, it is clear that their figures experienced the same trend even though the rise was not as much as London and New York. The number was doubled for the former which was 2% in the first period and 4% thereafter while the latter saw a slight increase from roughly -8% to -5%. Conversely, Frankfurt was the only city which saw the drop in house prices by 0.5%
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-05-22 | Ly8 | 84 | view |
2021-04-01 | Mirfayzbek | view | |
2021-04-01 | Mirfayzbek | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 67
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 84
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below shows how many students of a school in the UK chose to take part in four different sports between 2001 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, look, regarding, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 937.175257732 106% => OK
No of words: 215.0 206.0 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61395348837 4.54256449028 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38257601546 2.54303337028 94% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 127.690721649 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595348837209 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 290.88556701 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3176984367 44.8134815571 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.222222222 76.5299724578 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 16.8248392259 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 4.34317383033 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2705214072 0.216113520407 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114741592707 0.0766984524023 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124660597384 0.0603063233224 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194885470156 0.12726935374 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132777691394 0.0580467560999 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 8.37731958763 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 70.7449484536 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 8.71597938144 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 41.2886597938 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.