The two pie charts illustrates the percentage of the UK students in an England higher institution that could speak French, German, Spanish and other languages with English as their first language in 2000 and 2010.
Overall, a significant number of the indigenous English students spoke Spanish more than other languages but German language is not popular among them as it was the least spoken. Also, the students became more multilingual in 2010 than they were ten years ago.
From the charts, Spanish speakers markedly increased from 30% to 35%. This is also observed in other languages not listed which dramatically increased from 15% to 20%. Furthermore, their multilingual rate rose as they spoke more languages
in 2010 than the previous year.
On the other hand, the popularity of French speaking decreased from 15% to 10% whereas those who spoke German remained unchanged.
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 56
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 95
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views a 89
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 26.3917525773 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 719.0 937.175257732 77% => OK
No of words: 136.0 206.0 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28676470588 4.54256449028 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.41495297035 3.78020617076 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67839903054 2.54303337028 105% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 127.690721649 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.661764705882 0.622605031667 106% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 290.88556701 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5135551014 44.8134815571 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.714285714 76.5299724578 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 16.8248392259 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 4.34317383033 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193184028561 0.216113520407 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869023328406 0.0766984524023 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653498902939 0.0603063233224 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122814554131 0.12726935374 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641252298878 0.0580467560999 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 8.37731958763 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 70.7449484536 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 8.71597938144 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 41.2886597938 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.