The first chart below shows the percentages of women and men in a country involved in some kinds (cooking, cleaning, pet caring and repairing the house). The second chart show the amount of time each gender spent on each task per day. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts given compare a nation in terms of the proportion of males and females engaging in doing distict types of house chores and how much time they spent accomplishing each task per day.
It is clear from the first chart that women were prone to cook. Additionally, the second one indicates that females spared more time for completing tasks compared to males.
In the first chart, doing cooking was the most popular kind of house chores among women, at 80%, compared to 60% of them cleaning. Meanwhile, the rates of pet care and house repairs were 4 and 8 times as low as that of cooking, at 20% and nearly 10% respectively. About men, 60% of males completing cooking, followed by only 40% and over 20% of them doing cleaning and pet care in turn. Likewise, the proportion of house repairs constituted approximately one fifth of 100 % of the total.
The second chart illustrates that females tended to spend time cooking, at over 80 minutes each day, whereas exactly 60 minutes spared by males for doing this. Conversely, about cleaning, the figures for women and men were nearly 65 and 45 minutes in that order. The number of minutes used by males to care pets shared the comparable figues with that of females, at 20 minutes. By contrast, there are about 17 minutes spent by men repairing houses, compared to nearly 5 minutes used by women.
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 84
- The graph below show that the percentage of Australian export to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 89
- The pictures illustrate how the layout of a school library changed over five years 78
- In some countries online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- Governments should ban dangerous sports Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, likewise, second, whereas, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 32.9175257732 33% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 937.175257732 119% => OK
No of words: 238.0 206.0 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70168067227 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.78020617076 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48381959492 2.54303337028 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 127.690721649 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554621848739 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 290.88556701 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 1.44329896907 554% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.4039585379 44.8134815571 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.727272727 76.5299724578 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 16.8248392259 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 4.34317383033 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277448547735 0.216113520407 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109431214969 0.0766984524023 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510683475706 0.0603063233224 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178188062404 0.12726935374 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251695795763 0.0580467560999 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 8.37731958763 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 70.7449484536 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 8.71597938144 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 41.2886597938 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.