The provided line graph illustrates the proportion of visitors to four different tourist attractions in Brighton, UK, from 1980 to 2010.
It is clearly seen from the graph that Pavilion and Festival seemed to be the most attractive destinations to travellers over the 30-year period, compared to the other two. At the start, Pier was the least popular spot, however, in the last year, the attraction which was chosen by least tourists was Art gallery.
During the time from 1980 to 1995, the number of vacationers going to Pavilion significantly inclined from approximately 23% to roughly 48%. The identical trend was seen in the data for Art Gallery.The percentage of visitors to this spot hit the climax of nearly 37% in 1985 and stood at/ stopped at 8% in 2010, after some significant decreases.
Regarding Festival, from 1980 till 2000, the quantity of tourists visiting this location slightly fluctuated, and remained unchanged from 2000 until the end of the period. From 1990, the data for Pier started to grow steadily and stood at about 22% at the end of the 30-year period.
- The given line graph illustrates the proportion of visitors to England Who travelled to four different tourist s popular destinations in Brighton from 1980 to 2010 78
- The line graph illustrates how many grams of three types of fast food were consumed each week in UK between 1970 and 1990
- The pie chart below show the result of a survey of children s activities 84
- The given line graph illustrates the proportion of visitors to England Who travelled to four different tourist s popular destinations in Brighton from 1980 to 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...nd was seen in the data for Art Gallery.The percentage of visitors to this spot hit...
^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2010, after some significant decreases. Regarding Festival, from 1980 till 2000,...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 26.3917525773 159% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 937.175257732 97% => OK
No of words: 182.0 206.0 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97802197802 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70043626025 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 127.690721649 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60989010989 0.622605031667 98% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 290.88556701 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 1.44329896907 554% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 16.3608247423 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.6890436315 44.8134815571 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.428571429 76.5299724578 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 16.8248392259 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 4.34317383033 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286202217057 0.216113520407 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146803289251 0.0766984524023 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179978419487 0.0603063233224 298% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220124102997 0.12726935374 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.208147879505 0.0580467560999 359% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 8.37731958763 179% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 70.7449484536 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 8.71597938144 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 41.2886597938 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 8.54432989691 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.