The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided chart sheds light on the proportion of citizens recorded in several Asian countries namely The Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia during the researched period from 1970 to 2000, accompanied by forecasts for the years 2030 and 2040.
Overall, it is evident that the figures for dwellers in urban areas witnessed growth over the time during which the survey was conducted. Apparently, Malaysia showed the highest figures and it also played as the top tier in terms of the increasing speed.
With regard to the chart, despite starting as a 2nd runner-up at almost 30% in 1970, Malaysia's citizens accounted for the largest proportion of their population during the latter half of the period, from 2000 to 2040. With predictions of reaching its peak at more than 80% in 2040, the figures for Malaysia would certainly doubles that of the lowest country predicted, Thailand, at approximately 40%.
Accordingly, the percentage of citizens in The Philippines and Indonesia met at relatively 40% in the year 2010, while Indonesia began the survey with the highest figures in 1970 and the Philippines, on the contrary, was reported as the lowest at about 15%. Thailand also experienced a slight rise during the first 20 years, but then remained stable in the next 30 years before eventually took off again to its peak forecasted in 2040.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-17 | hungthetroller2008@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-06 | within_24 | 84 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'double'
Suggestion: double
...he figures for Malaysia would certainly doubles that of the lowest country predicted, T...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, first, so, then, well, while, on the contrary, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 937.175257732 122% => OK
No of words: 222.0 206.0 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13063063063 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74575692168 2.54303337028 108% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 127.690721649 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599099099099 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 290.88556701 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 16.3608247423 189% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.8097692679 44.8134815571 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.714285714 76.5299724578 213% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 31.7142857143 16.8248392259 188% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8571428571 4.34317383033 319% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157476778639 0.216113520407 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708196555856 0.0766984524023 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515444621888 0.0603063233224 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961732706748 0.12726935374 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052712820162 0.0580467560999 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 8.37731958763 222% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 70.7449484536 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 7.45979381443 190% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 8.71597938144 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 7.59969072165 121% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 41.2886597938 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 8.54432989691 169% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'double'
Suggestion: double
...he figures for Malaysia would certainly doubles that of the lowest country predicted, T...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, first, so, then, well, while, on the contrary, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 937.175257732 122% => OK
No of words: 222.0 206.0 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13063063063 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74575692168 2.54303337028 108% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 127.690721649 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599099099099 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 290.88556701 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 16.3608247423 189% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.8097692679 44.8134815571 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.714285714 76.5299724578 213% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 31.7142857143 16.8248392259 188% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8571428571 4.34317383033 319% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157476778639 0.216113520407 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708196555856 0.0766984524023 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515444621888 0.0603063233224 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961732706748 0.12726935374 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052712820162 0.0580467560999 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 8.37731958763 222% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 70.7449484536 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 7.45979381443 190% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 8.71597938144 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 7.59969072165 121% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 41.2886597938 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 8.54432989691 169% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.