The line graph illustrates the carbon dioxide emissions on average in the 4 countries from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, Italy and Portugal had increased tendencies, while the UK and Sweden showed the contrast. Besides, the United Kingdom produced the biggest amount of CO2 emissions during the 40-year period, as opposed to Portugal, where the average CO2 people emitting account for the least in the same time.
As can be seen from the graph, the United Kingdom reached a plateau at nearly 11 metric tonnes in the first three years. Subsequently, the figure went down markedly and reached approximately 9 metric tonnes in 2007. As regards Sweden, there was an upward trend observed between 1967 and 1977, which it reached a peak at just over 10 metric tonnes in 1977. Then, the figure dramatically dropped until 1987, followed by a noticeably decline until 2007.
In contrast, there were upward trends in Italy and Portugal. In 1967, the average CO2 people emitting in Italy was 4 metric tonnes, whereas, in Portugal, the figure was by half the Italy. The figures for both countries rose remarkably during the period. From 1997 to 2007, the figure of Italy stayed constant, while the Portugal one observed a slight increase and reached nearly 5.5 metric tonnes in 2007.
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 61
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment Why is this happening what are the solutions 11
- The two column charts show the percentage of food and other items bought by 3 European countries in 1998 and 2008
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 84
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('noticeably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...tically dropped until 1987, followed by a noticeably decline until 2007. In contrast, there were ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, then, whereas, while, as regards, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 32.9175257732 3% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 937.175257732 114% => OK
No of words: 212.0 206.0 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02358490566 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4616089275 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 127.690721649 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 290.88556701 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 0.824742268041 1091% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.83505154639 272% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3946449434 44.8134815571 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8181818182 76.5299724578 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 16.8248392259 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 4.34317383033 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219579369596 0.216113520407 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847072071504 0.0766984524023 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689745330687 0.0603063233224 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161227080038 0.12726935374 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692036705706 0.0580467560999 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 8.37731958763 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 70.7449484536 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 8.71597938144 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 7.59969072165 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 41.2886597938 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.