The given line graph compares the average emissions of carbon dioxide per capita in four European countries within a time span of forty years from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the UK produced the biggest amount of CO2 per person of all four nations over the survey period, despite the fact that levels fell slightly. Furthermore emission dropped significantly in Sweden while levels rose in Italy and Portugal.
In 1967 the UK emitted around 11 metric tonnes per person, although this values decreased gradually over the time, the UK remained the biggest polluter with 9 tonnes in 2007. We can see a different picture when it comes to Sweden. In the first decade there was increase which led to emission of over 10 tonnes per capita, and over the next decade it fell drastically. A downward trend continued in Sweden and in final year they had the same CO2 output as Portuguese. (around 5 tonnes per person)
In contrast, there were noticeable increases in the CO2 emitted by Italians and Portuguese over the four decades. Italy’s figure almost doubled, making it the second highest emitter by 2007 while Portugal’s figure rose even more dramatically from 1 metric tonne to about 5 tonnes per person.
- the charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 33
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ite the fact that levels fell slightly. Furthermore emission dropped significantly in Swede...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 468, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Around
... had the same CO2 output as Portuguese. around 5 tonnes per person In contrast, the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 32.9175257732 27% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 937.175257732 109% => OK
No of words: 207.0 206.0 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95169082126 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59618578579 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 127.690721649 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623188405797 0.622605031667 100% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 290.88556701 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.3763217312 44.8134815571 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.888888889 76.5299724578 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 16.8248392259 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 4.34317383033 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216856765211 0.216113520407 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868070838223 0.0766984524023 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466007554639 0.0603063233224 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136985668473 0.12726935374 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364792174325 0.0580467560999 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 8.37731958763 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 70.7449484536 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 8.71597938144 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 7.59969072165 122% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 41.2886597938 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.