The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and
vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and
2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make comparisons where relevant
The line graph provides information about changes in price in the USA of three
different food product groups from 1979 to 2009, and the overall trend in the
consumer price index over this 30-year period.
Overall, it is clear that prices increased for the three food product groups,
despite fluctuations. Only the increase in the prices for fresh fruits and
vegetables was significantly higher than the rise in the general consumer price
index.
All the lines on the graph have the same starting figure in 1979. Over the
period, the consumer price index rose steadily from around 60 in 1979 to over
200 in 2009. Prices for sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks showed similar
trends. Although their prices also rose, they were consistently below the
consumer price index average after 1987. After many minor fluctuations, the
number for sugar and sweets was 200 on the graph in 2009, higher than the final
figure for carbonated drinks at 150.
Prices rose sharply for fresh fruits and vegetables, particularly after 1989. From
the same figure of about 60 at the start of the period, the prices finished at
roughly 330 on the index in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-19 | RoseNguyen | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Writ 78
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits andvegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds ofmeat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmake comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 937.175257732 104% => OK
No of words: 194.0 206.0 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03092783505 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34906810204 2.54303337028 92% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 127.690721649 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.622605031667 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 290.88556701 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5227096823 44.8134815571 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 76.5299724578 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 16.8248392259 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2 4.34317383033 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 16.0 4.29896907216 372% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201914832911 0.216113520407 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976886636665 0.0766984524023 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657561585024 0.0603063233224 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767869168706 0.12726935374 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648710799107 0.0580467560999 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 8.37731958763 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 70.7449484536 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 8.71597938144 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 41.2886597938 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.