The graph below shows the total value of exports and the value of fuel, food and manufactured goods exported by one country from 2000 to 2005.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two graphs shows the change in the value of fuel, food, manufactured goods and the total value of exports over five years starting in 2000 and ending in 2005,
Its obvious in the first chart regarding the total value of exports that it was slightly dropping down at the first three years to arrive to amount 250,000 million dollars in 2002, then its starts to increase to be between 400,000 and 450,000 million at year 2005.
If we take a look to the second graph we can see that the food value is almost stable over the five years with value under 10,000 million dollars. Also, the value of manufactured goods shows a little variations during the five years, its started in 2000 with amount under 20,000 million dollars and keep increasing to be in 2002 over 20,000 million dollars, then decreased between 2002 and 2003 and its value was approximately 20,000 million dollars, after 2003 and within the last three years its start to raises up a little to be in 2005 over 20,000 million dollars. While if we tracked the value of the fuel exports into those five years we will find that its decreased sharply as it was in 2000 under 50,000 million dollars and keep loose its value to arrive to 20,000 million dollars by the year 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | Abdelrahman_m25 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'variation'?
Suggestion: variation
...ue of manufactured goods shows a little variations during the five years, its started in 2...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 738, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...0 under 50,000 million dollars and keep loose its value to arrive to 20,000 million d...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, regarding, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 32.9175257732 52% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 26.3917525773 171% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 937.175257732 109% => OK
No of words: 223.0 206.0 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59192825112 4.54256449028 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.12757468288 2.54303337028 84% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 127.690721649 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452914798206 0.622605031667 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 290.88556701 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.41237113402 85% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 12.6804123711 32% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 55.0 16.3608247423 336% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.134997007 44.8134815571 270% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 256.0 76.5299724578 335% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 55.75 16.8248392259 331% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 14.25 4.34317383033 328% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195705623928 0.216113520407 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148252589886 0.0766984524023 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653490569347 0.0603063233224 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216216617044 0.12726935374 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149790538895 0.0580467560999 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.1 8.37731958763 335% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 70.7449484536 70% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.0 7.45979381443 268% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.23 8.71597938144 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 41.2886597938 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.0 8.62886597938 301% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 24.0 8.54432989691 281% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 26.0 8.15463917526 319% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.