The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp

The first bar chart Illustrates the ratio of population owing computers in 2002 to 2010. In addition, the other one describes the same with the different academic groups of people During the same time period. It is clear that the number of population having ownership of our computer is gradually increasing from past years.

In the first chart, the proportion of people having computer kept on going Up by 5% in a period of two years. As it shows, In 2002 the statistics were 55% and finally ending at 75% in 2010.

Moreover, in the second chart Education level was added. According to it, People with less education had few computers. Also, As the level of academic achievement increased, the percentage of computer owing population also grew step by step. The most number of owners belong from University level education such as bachelors or post graduate. In higher studies, 90% students had computers. Although, The growth rate was gradual, There was significant addition in numbers During the transfer of students from school to college level academics.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...oportion of people having computer kept on going Up by 5% in a period of two years. As i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dition in numbers During the transfer of students from school to college level ac...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 5.05154639175 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 937.175257732 95% => OK
No of words: 176.0 206.0 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07954545455 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67137314955 2.54303337028 105% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 127.690721649 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607954545455 0.622605031667 98% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 290.88556701 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9723950672 44.8134815571 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2727272727 76.5299724578 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 16.8248392259 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 4.34317383033 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.94845360825 177% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174891714377 0.216113520407 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655444439692 0.0766984524023 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590247645092 0.0603063233224 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117276454266 0.12726935374 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206446676012 0.0580467560999 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 8.37731958763 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 70.7449484536 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 7.45979381443 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 8.71597938144 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 7.59969072165 107% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 41.2886597938 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.