Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced

An increase in the waste production is one of the major problem across the globe. A possible reason is people tend to buy more then their actual requirement this is the case especially with the food items. To reduce these wastage government can impose a disposal tax and start awareness campaigns to educate people to limit their production of rubbish and try to recycle as much as possible.

In today's fast life most of the people rely on fast food or packaged food to save their time required in cooking. Also, time limitation makes people to buy things in advance, resulting in buying more than the required quantity. For instance, many people prepare their shopping list and in a single go they purchase their grocery in bulk that can last for about a month. This makes it difficult to calculate the consumption and there are pretty chances that this food will end up in a garbage.

A solution to stop such waste is. one can limit buying food to a minimum quantity. Also, if food is left uneaten, individual can help to pass on the food to the poor and needy people instead of throwing it away. One other solution is that government can try to motivate people to recycle products and allow then an easy access for recycling. Another thing is, an extra tax should be charged to people who produce waste more than the required quantity.

In conclusion, it has become really important to put a restriction on this garbage production as it is increasing day by day, people needs to adjust their purchase in daily requirement. And, government can help by educating people and making recycle plant accessible to all the citizens.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...sible reason is people tend to buy more then their actual requirement this is the ca...
^^^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wastage' or 'these wastages'?
Suggestion: this wastage; these wastages
...pecially with the food items. To reduce these wastage government can impose a disposal tax an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'garbage'.
Suggestion: garbage
...y chances that this food will end up in a garbage. A solution to stop such waste is. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...ople to recycle products and allow then an easy access for recycling. Another thing is, an ext...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, really, so, then, another thing, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 32.9175257732 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 26.3917525773 155% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.85567010309 389% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 937.175257732 144% => OK
No of words: 285.0 206.0 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74385964912 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.78020617076 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52957878943 2.54303337028 99% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 127.690721649 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 290.88556701 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.0251913649 44.8134815571 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5714285714 76.5299724578 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 16.8248392259 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 4.34317383033 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.49484536082 468% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130460722998 0.216113520407 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468986047178 0.0766984524023 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362082691276 0.0603063233224 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855539408757 0.12726935374 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270573823033 0.0580467560999 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 8.37731958763 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 70.7449484536 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 8.71597938144 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 7.59969072165 103% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 41.2886597938 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.