The persuading techniques used in out lives and not only
The population on the Earth is growing at an unprecedented scale and so is the demands and requests of this population for satisfying its needs and necessities. The briefest reflection on the modern world reveals that the tendencies to persuade people to do what you want are becoming more and more common and popular, not only in the business sphere, but as well in the private life. While one may be absolutely convinced that these persuading techniques don’t work out at all, the cutting-edge and path-breaking explorations argue that this is in fact a case. How often have you met them in a private life? Or even over - have you ever faced them in your life?
Having analyzed the data in business activities over the last decades, the British scientists published the outrageous results – never in the recorded history has the terrorism of mass e-mailing and cold-calling been as widely spread as it is today. Indeed, all we can be said to have got at least several times these irritating e-mails with eye-catching pictures and haunting song-tracks which are pushing us to buy a good, to subscribe to something or someone, to attend an opening of restaurant/café/mall/fitness-center etc. Coming back to the British explorations, there is as well the proof of viability of these techniques – there have been observed a tremendous increasing and inevitable peaking of selling customer-goods via the Internet services as Amazon, E- bay over the last year.
The other aspect of corporations’ influence on us must be pointed out here shortly. Using the quantitative methods for processing the unstructured data – such as satellite images, statistics of web-sites interested for users etc. – can be estimated as the new, quite a perspective tool for developing in this direction, direction of persuading people to do what the corporations want. However, that is all about how the business can affect us, but what about the impact that we can have on the other people or they can on us?
While, the techniques mentioned above are powerful and prominent, so are the way of convincing used in the daily routine. The experiment which took a place in this case in the USA delivered the evidence of these claim. Using “the magic words” – such as “please, may I …” or “there is a huge exigency because my daughter…” etc.- for persuading people plays a crucial role in this story. Were it not for using them, getting the ultimate aim, for instance - to pass the queue, would be almost impossible. Having processed the aftermath of this trial the conclusion was as obvious as a nose on your face – giving a reason to other people why you are asking for a favor can be a significant tool for persuading and getting what we want.
In conclusion, it can be said there is blizzard of methods for receiving the target used not only in a private life, but also in the business spheres, especially in the business spheres. Given the humankind history and taking into consideration the recent breakouts, it can be easily concluded that the ceiling in this direction has not been reached yet. The huge achievements are waiting for us and there is no a need to retreat a Luddite attitude to them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | KarinaShine | 78 | view |
- Claim The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models Reason Heroes and role models reveal a society s highest ideals 65
- The influence of adds on children 73
- Public persons in Media 67
- Low-cost traveling 78
- Mind Challenges in the Modern World 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 410, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...vements are waiting for us and there is no a need to retreat a Luddite attitude to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, while, at least, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 7.48453608247 374% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 4.92783505155 264% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 5.05154639175 416% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 32.9175257732 131% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 26.3917525773 235% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 3.85567010309 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2697.0 937.175257732 288% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 545.0 206.0 265% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94862385321 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 3.78020617076 128% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2370864856 2.54303337028 127% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 127.690721649 221% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517431192661 0.622605031667 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 849.6 290.88556701 292% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 9.0 0.824742268041 1091% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.463917525773 1078% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6804123711 158% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 16.3608247423 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8015767288 44.8134815571 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.85 76.5299724578 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 16.8248392259 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 4.34317383033 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 7.41237113402 148% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.94845360825 177% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144904346103 0.216113520407 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417079689838 0.0766984524023 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464298467815 0.0603063233224 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775549112283 0.12726935374 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372264802044 0.0580467560999 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 8.37731958763 185% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 70.7449484536 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 7.45979381443 185% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 8.71597938144 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 41.2886597938 341% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 8.54432989691 150% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.