The pie chart illustrated the percentage of people with different languages on the internet. The table depicted the average number of online users in million and in relation to the overall world population.
In general, the population of online users showed an upward trend from 1997 to 2001. Moreover, it is clear that most of the users on online platforms were English speakers in 2001. Also, according to the given pie chart, the second-highest proportion of spoken language is Japanese.
It is clearly seen from the chart that the number of Japanese speakers is about one-fifth in comparison to those who speak English with 8.9% on its own. On the other hand, the lowest proportion related to Dutch speakers which are 2.1%. furthermore, an increasing pattern can be seen between the numbers for other language speakers from 2.6% for Portuguese to 8.8% for Chinese.
Moreover, looking at the table, a drastic change can be seen between the percent of online users from 1.8% in 1997 to 8.4% in 2011.
- the graph shows the number of cases of X disease in Someland between 1960 and 1995. 61
- The pie chart shows the number of people who were using different languages online. The table shows the average number of people online each year. 78
- The chart shows the number of female and male people arrested by type of offence (crime) 78
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling ,a gap year,before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons.For others this is an expensive waste of time .Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- the graph shows the number of visitors to a variety of art galleries in 2011 38
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...d the average number of online users in million and in relation to the overall world po...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...lated to Dutch speakers which are 2.1%. furthermore, an increasing pattern can be seen betw...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, so, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 5.05154639175 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 937.175257732 89% => OK
No of words: 169.0 206.0 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95857988166 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62178926104 2.54303337028 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 127.690721649 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568047337278 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 290.88556701 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.0462517292 44.8134815571 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.1111111111 76.5299724578 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 16.8248392259 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 4.34317383033 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258336108521 0.216113520407 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101203038027 0.0766984524023 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741877062313 0.0603063233224 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153725124426 0.12726935374 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114955553207 0.0580467560999 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 8.37731958763 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 70.7449484536 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 8.71597938144 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 41.2886597938 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.