There has been a stereotype which existed long time ago that going to a place where English is widely spoken will provide pupils with the best technique of English instruction. Nevertheless, In my opinion, it is an efficient, yet not an optimal choice for them to meet.
On the one hand, studying abroad is an ideal approach to learn about other countries as spending time living in another country creates a golden chance for pupils to enhance their knowledge of other nations that differ from theirs . For starters, when studying overseas, it is paramount of importance that students acquire fundamental grammar to strike up a basic conversation with indigenous people. Therefore, by listening to native speakers and using it on a daily basis, pupils can reach a high level of competence in it and step by step have an air of confidence about their communication skills. To cite an example, teenagers who study overseas tend to speak fluently their second languages or have the ability to learn languages more quickly than those who do not. Moreover, the exposure to various customs and languages can broaden young people’s horizon and open their minds.
Despite the practical benefits aforementioned, it is undeniable that only the affluent and privileged are willing to fork out extravagant money for their children going abroad. For impoverished individuals, with minimum wage, it seems beyond their reach. Not only money for flights and accommodation do pupils need to take into consideration but also for fundamental demands. Furthermore, culture shock as well as homesickness in the initial days possibly affect the process they acquire understanding. However, there are several ways to acquire this language. Firstly, with the advent of cutting-edge technologies, learners can access to their studying materials. The internet is updated every day from numerous sources, making it current and pertinent. Moreover, it also enables youngsters to connect with the local people in one English country effortlessly. Another remedy is learning through English programmes. Considered as the most effective way to learn English, watching TV series will assist you to increase your listening skills and know the exact/precise wording in each situation.
In conclusion, due to the budgetary constraints, most students cannot study abroad. However, this has no bearing on their acquisition of knowledge as there are still a number of perfect substitutions, helping them learn about the world without leaving their country.
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
- Some people believe that a gap year between school and university is a good idea while others disagree strongly Consider both sides of this debate and present your own opinion 78
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- A large number of people think that nowadays women should not work hard to earn their living they should spend more time in caring for their families To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...of other nations that differ from theirs . For starters, when studying overseas, i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.03092783505 297% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 32.9175257732 94% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 26.3917525773 208% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 3.85567010309 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 937.175257732 228% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 395.0 206.0 192% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40506329114 4.54256449028 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 3.78020617076 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95392270913 2.54303337028 116% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 127.690721649 190% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615189873418 0.622605031667 99% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 290.88556701 223% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 1.44329896907 554% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6804123711 150% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.3757625404 44.8134815571 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.368421053 76.5299724578 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7894736842 16.8248392259 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05263157895 4.34317383033 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29764724442 0.216113520407 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758912143424 0.0766984524023 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569672371889 0.0603063233224 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153254066098 0.12726935374 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555721651408 0.0580467560999 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 8.37731958763 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 70.7449484536 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 8.71597938144 162% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 7.59969072165 125% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 41.2886597938 293% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.