Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree

It is frequently argued that pupils study far more with their teachers than other sources such as the internet or television. In my opinion, I completely agree with this view. It can not be denied that students can learn a lot from the internet and TV set and these have become an indispensable part of education yet I believed that educators have a more crucial role in the class. And in this essay, I will demonstrate my point of view by analyzing the merits of studying with their schoolteachers and the sundry disadvantages of absorbing through the internet and tiny screen.

There are several compelling reasons why pupils learn far more with their dons than other sources. To begin with, supervisors are well-versed in the subject, all professionally trained, have high qualifications, and have the necessary teaching skills consequently they know to stimulate their pupils' interest. For instance, sophomores who study with their lecturers are more likely to pay attention to their grinding while an undergraduate pondering by himself through the internet and television may get bored and stop learning. Second, apprentices in high school and the university will benefit from the educational environment. They can interact in groups by going to class with their classmates. As a result, their motivation will be greatly increased.

Those who study through other means, such as the Internet or telly, have both advantages and disadvantages. It is also plain that the internet is an ocean of knowledge. You can get any information from the internet yet there is no authenticity of this information whether it is exact or not. Next, they can economize. To illustrate, they oughtn't to worry about wasting time traveling to and from school or university. They also gain more opportunities for future planning. However, there are a number of drawbacks to studying at home via the Internet or television. They are unable to concentrate on their lessons due to interruptions from other family members. Notwithstanding, when they are watching goggle-box or surfing the web, they will come across irrelevant subjects.

To put it in a nutshell, no doubt TV and the Internet are extremely educative these days on the contrary pupils learn more from the tutors.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, second, so, then, well, while, for instance, no doubt, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1689373297 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0245084321 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536784741144 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5224279008 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.85 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.35 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298979129153 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864786424027 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922523002545 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180006345889 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842844448051 0.056905535591 148% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.