The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The table illustrates the percentage of people from six household types living below the poverty line in Australia in the year 1999.
Overall, the percentage of sole parents and single with no children were the highest groups, whilst the percentage of age couples and single age people were the lowest groups of poor families. The remaining two categories had an average percentage compared to the highest and lowest family groups.
It is noticeable that 11% of all households in Australians were living in poverty in 1999. The elderly people were the least likely in poverty. The percentage of at 6% and 4 % for single aged people and aged couples respectively.
On the other hand, one out of every five sole parent households was classes as poor that rate was nearly twice higher than of couples with children. In comparison, the poverty rates of single with no children had lower values at 7% that figure was approximately one third than the percentage of couples with no children at 19%.
- It is argue that parents od children who break the rules should be punished in some ways as parents are reponsible for the children s actions To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- The table below shows thenumbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 73
- the chart below shows information about students studying in six main subjects at a US university in 2010 78
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate 20
- The table below shows thenumbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 26.3917525773 106% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 937.175257732 88% => OK
No of words: 168.0 206.0 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92857142857 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63937164742 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 127.690721649 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 290.88556701 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.3126293102 44.8134815571 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 76.5299724578 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 16.8248392259 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 4.34317383033 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.49484536082 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110104910502 0.216113520407 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606389347326 0.0766984524023 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054902274069 0.0603063233224 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859447742287 0.12726935374 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571349334599 0.0580467560999 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 8.37731958763 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 70.7449484536 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 8.71597938144 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 7.59969072165 99% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 41.2886597938 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.