The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes (in percentages).
The table compares the number of tourists arriving in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010. In general, tourism rose slightly in the United States, Spain, the UK, and Italy and increased dramatically in Turkey, China, and Germany. Figures fell in Hong Kong and were stable in France, which had the most tourists overall.
Looking first of all at France, numbers were unchanged at 76 million tourists in both years. The United States increased by 1.5% from 66 to 67 million and Spain followed a similar trajectory (55 to 56 million tourists). Tourists to the UK increased by double that rate (3.6%) and overtook Spain in 2010 by 1 million visitors. In Italy, the rate of growth was slower at 2.3%, translating to an increase to 45 million. Turkey surged past Italy, rising 33% to 46 million.
There were also significant increases in China, which went from 22 to 34 million (a 55% growth), and Germany (a 109% expansion to 24 million). The lowest numbers were in Hong Kong as tourism fell by 11% to end at 9 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-30 | Lê Thị Thanh Tâm | 73 | view |
- The table shows the number of international tourist arrivals in thousands in various countries in 2009 and 2010 together with the percentage change in these numbers 67
- People living in large cites today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 73
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The table shows the number of international tourist arrivals in thousands in various countries in 2009 and 2010 together with the percentage change in these numbers 73
- The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes in percentages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, as to, in general, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 32.9175257732 3% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 937.175257732 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 206.0 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65168539326 4.54256449028 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5223405286 2.54303337028 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 127.690721649 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 290.88556701 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.141155292 44.8134815571 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.8 76.5299724578 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 16.8248392259 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 4.34317383033 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225513395824 0.216113520407 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108218076322 0.0766984524023 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129594169137 0.0603063233224 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154091552895 0.12726935374 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573709763243 0.0580467560999 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 8.37731958763 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 70.7449484536 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 7.45979381443 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 8.71597938144 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 7.59969072165 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 41.2886597938 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.