The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts compare the expenditures per year of a school in the UK in three separate years: 1981,1991 and 2001.
Overall, it is clear that teachers’ salaries occupied the largest cost to school, and whereas spending on furniture equipment and insurance grew dramatically, there were drops in expenditures on resources like books and other workers’salaries.
It is can be seen that the highest spending was on staff’s salaries. While other workers’ salaries witnessed a decrease from 28% in 1981 to only 15% in 2001, teachers’pay remained the greatest cost, reaching 50% in 1991 and ending at 45% in total spending of 2001. By contrast, insurance was the lowest cost in three years whereas it saw a dramatic rise by 7%.
Before falling to 9% in the end of period, spending on resources such as books had increased to 20% by 1991. In contrast, furniture and equipment cost saw an opposite trend when it declined 10% between 1981 and 1991. Then, the cost had a considerable increase, standing at 23% in the end year.
- Students should pay the full cost of their own university studies rather than have free higher education provided by the state 73
- the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Tourists damage many historical places making them harder to preserve What are some of the reasons for this Suggest some ways to resolve this problem Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Writ 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, whereas, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 26.3917525773 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 937.175257732 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 206.0 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9367816092 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00088615969 2.54303337028 118% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 127.690721649 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.622605031667 98% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 290.88556701 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.4838385796 44.8134815571 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 76.5299724578 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 16.8248392259 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 4.34317383033 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246349690734 0.216113520407 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107999513797 0.0766984524023 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118193509395 0.0603063233224 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175534967359 0.12726935374 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135502390824 0.0580467560999 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 8.37731958763 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 70.7449484536 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 8.71597938144 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 41.2886597938 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.