Although technology in the agriculture department has been developed, people are still suffering from hunger. This essay will first submit that the biggest problems are the lower wage of labor’s and unemployment then submit government to make subsidies and as the viable solution
The foremost problem is the low salaries of workers. Also, some people who are not educated are not able to find a job. As a result of minimum wage workers are not able to maintain their expenditures as one’s have to spend money on different things. Such as rent, light bills, gas bills, produce, children’s institutions' fees, and so on. Sometimes they are broken up as reasons for lack of money. For instance, A lower-class individual can not afford these expenses on his or her pay, and some time they are not able to buy goods.
The government should help those people by giving funds on monthly basis, who are suffering from hunger, it would be a possible solution. For example, governments of developed nations are helping poor people by giving grains on weekly basis.
To conclude, huger is caused by a lack of enough money to by produce is one of the foremost challenges people face and it will ultimately lead to malnutrition, but a possible solution could be to helping people with government funds.
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 56
- More and more people are opting for readymade food instead of freshly cooked food does this practicr has more advantages than disadvantages 61
- using advanced technology in agriculture such as chemical fertilizers and machinery has resulted in producing more food some people however think these technologies have negative effects what are the advantages and this advantages 78
- There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones What forms do they take Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phone 73
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, then, for example, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.48453608247 200% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 32.9175257732 33% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 26.3917525773 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 937.175257732 116% => OK
No of words: 219.0 206.0 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95890410959 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72229615459 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 127.690721649 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62100456621 0.622605031667 100% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 290.88556701 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.7348217588 44.8134815571 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.6 76.5299724578 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 16.8248392259 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 4.34317383033 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119340774766 0.216113520407 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453721544616 0.0766984524023 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343917675814 0.0603063233224 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653586141035 0.12726935374 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233589591585 0.0580467560999 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 8.37731958763 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 70.7449484536 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 8.71597938144 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 41.2886597938 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.