You local council is considering closing a sports and leisure center that it runs, in order to save money.
Write a letter to your local council. In your letter
* give details of how you and your friends or family use the center
* explain why the sports and leisure center is important for the local community
* describe the possible effects on local people if the center closes
Dear Sir or Madam,
This letter is regarding my concerns on the closing of our local sports and leisure center.
I and my family have been using the community center since many years. Both my parents have health issues, and have been using the community center gym to keep in good shape and improve their cholesterol levels. Also, my teenage son and daughter regularly use the swimming pool for their swim practice lessons. And, I have been using it to play basketball along with my friends.
There is no doubt that this sports and leisure center as been an integral part of our community. Many of our senior citizens in the community gather here during the evenings to spend time with each other, and a lot of teenagers use it as a place to hangout and play sports. Plus, during the winter time it is a great place for all indoor activities.
The closing of this center would have a very negative impact on the whole community. Firstly, it will have a major health impact because all the people who have been doing exercise here will not have a place to workout, this would not only deteriorate their physical health, but also their mental and emotional health. The next major impact will be on all the young children who are physically active when they are here at the center, who will now turn to playing video games and watching television, which will make them obese and inactive.
Considering all the disadvantages of closing this sports and leisure center, I request you to please consider keeping this center open for the welfare of our whole community.
Yours faithfully,
Imran Mohammed
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-07-04 | imran.techie@gmail.com | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 14, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty. Yours faithfully, Imran Mohammed
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, regarding, so, no doubt, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 5.05154639175 277% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 32.9175257732 94% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 26.3917525773 102% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 937.175257732 143% => OK
No of words: 279.0 206.0 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79211469534 4.54256449028 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.78020617076 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35451954434 2.54303337028 93% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 127.690721649 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551971326165 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 290.88556701 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.13402061856 88% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0634772701 44.8134815571 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.846153846 76.5299724578 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 16.8248392259 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 4.34317383033 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17821221203 0.216113520407 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07632871057 0.0766984524023 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748513926576 0.0603063233224 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1308249461 0.12726935374 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960952311671 0.0580467560999 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 8.37731958763 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 70.7449484536 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 8.71597938144 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 41.2886597938 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.