Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers. Employers' organizations say that in a global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent
What are your views?
In recent years, the huge amount of salary is the main target of ordinary employees in well-developed corporations. It is certainly true that there is immense gap in amount of wage between top managers and average workers. However employers' organizations consider that high skilled managers are important in a global market. It is argued that rewarding employees properly and encouraging them right, can improve relationship between headquarters and normal workers.
To begin with fact that typical top managers have high salaries which let them buy expensive houses, cars and clothes. For instance, average chairman in big company gets 150.00 - 500.000 dollars per year which is three times more than ordinary workers earn. When looking at this example, there is no doubt that headquarters of huge companies earn significantly more money than typical workers. Because, they have more duties than simple employees which are important to get high income. From this, it can be concluded that there is huge gap and misunderstanding in relationship between top and low employees.
Secondly, some employer organizations try to find best talents in sphare of management which are necessary in global market, because they have considerable impact on productivety a company. In this case, employers reward the talented workers by improving their position at company and increasing their salaty. As good example, chairman who gives cheques to talented employees, which let them create luxury parties, buy expensive houses and cars. Thus example clearly shows that wrong reward can contribute to abuse responsibilities of empoyees. Therefore, authorities of advanced company should encourage them properly by offering workers much more time to spend with their relatives.
After analyzing the areas of first and second paragraph. It is obviously seen that incorrect prize and motivation can lead to negative consequences. As has been proven, difference in amount of salary can occure misunderstanding and deterioration in relationship among employees. It is predicted that employers should controle and regulate the wage of workers to avoid staff quarells.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In recent years, the huge amount of sala...
^^
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t there is immense gap in amount of wage between top managers and average workers...
^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...tween top managers and average workers. However employers organizations consider that h...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...een headquarters and normal workers. To begin with fact that typical top mana...
^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cantly more money than typical workers. Because, they have more duties than simple empl...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ionship between top and low employees. Secondly, some employer organizations tr...
^^
Line 4, column 48, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'find the best'.
Suggestion: find the best
...dly, some employer organizations try to find best talents in sphare of management which a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re time to spend with their relatives. After analyzing the areas of first and s...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'for instance', 'no doubt', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.260387811634 0.247107548796 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.157894736842 0.15552993741 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.12188365651 0.0946569551029 129% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0387811634349 0.0501201869031 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0387811634349 0.0437536398559 89% => OK
Prepositions: 0.141274238227 0.122223957237 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0360110803324 0.0403219363162 89% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01397202453 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0221606648199 0.0326786765898 68% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0360110803324 0.0861751148067 42% => More determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0193905817175 0.0214082191602 91% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0193905817175 0.0119246538136 163% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2157.0 1933.38276553 112% => OK
No of words: 328.0 316.052104208 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.55623100304 6.10592293882 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20519365927 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.435975609756 0.37474360046 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.353658536585 0.284197041944 124% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.256097560976 0.203843217982 126% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.167682926829 0.137313986986 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01397202453 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579268292683 0.560935902166 103% => OK
Word variations: 64.3175919338 60.7401812628 106% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0911823647 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.2222222222 20.7725350517 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2127534553 49.5273876611 55% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.213872832 93.4120437189 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.063583815 15.2821509519 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.728323699422 0.594174754866 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.39078156313 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01102204409 160% => OK
Readability: 53.5880758808 49.1922392462 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.85882352941 1.69127372897 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Topic essay coherence: 0.310544818883 0.332604825255 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0671207149915 0.102734651613 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0440081916692 0.0668474354756 66% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.467984664582 0.534917948617 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0749922313232 0.148666948902 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111322589051 0.13441755203 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590793977426 0.0742828286743 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.291808353246 0.324241079732 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.051392474478 0.0640056729886 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20826048017 0.22793763319 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334897251438 0.0582452615562 57% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.68436873747 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41883767535 58% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.88977955912 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.60220440882 38% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.00200400802 50% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.493987976 86% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 80.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 7.5 Out of 9