Government spending should only be focused on public services, and it is a waste of money to spend on arts(eg. painting or music)
to what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about how goverment spending should be allocated. To a certain extent, I agree with the contention that it is vital to spend the budget on public services. However, I also believe that investment in arts sector is worth considering.
On the one hand, it is important to spend the money on public services for three reasons. Firstly, the majority of people use public transport when they commute to work. It is always crowded and it may lead to minor injuries among people. Also, rate of road accidents by car has been increasing these days. Government could reduce the road accidents and promote safer commuting facilities by investing in public services, which would lead to fewer people having to travel by car. Secondly, it is important to live in a safe society where citizen can trust their neighbours and have the belief in the integrity of state institution. Government can help to achieve this by strengthening police forces. Finally, many senior citizens need financial support and care. Helping these people financially may have a positive impact on society, as a whole.
On the other hand, I believe that some money can be spent on arts sector as it is a source of entertainment. Many people, arranging from, young aged group to older people enjoy leigure activities such as going to a concert or exhibition. At the same time, art exhibition plays an important role in teaching visitors the history behind the exhibits or paintings and attracting tourists, contributing to domestic economy. Without this culture, people will become bored and we will lose our identity.
For the reasons mentioned above, I believe that it is more beneficial by not disregarding arts sector.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-12-17 | sherin rijo | 77 | view |
- The table below shows the percentage of Australian households with access to computers or internet 1998 2000 Summarize the information by choosing and identifying the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- Governments should not have to provide care or financial support for elderly people because it is the responsibility of each person to prepare for retirement and support him or herself. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 70
- In most countries multinational companies and their products are becoming more and more important.This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life.Do you agree or disagree? 80
- As mass communication and transport continue to grow, societies are becoming more and more alike leading to a phenomenon known as globalization. Some people fear that globalization will inevitably lead to the total loss of cultural identity. To what exten 80
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 93
Sentence: People have different views about how goverment spending should be allocated.
Error: goverment Suggestion: government
Sentence: Many people, arranging from, young aged group to older people enjoy leigure activities such as going to a concert or exhibition.
Error: leigure Suggestion: leisure
flaws:
Sentence Length SD: 5.869 7.5
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.039 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 284 350
No. of Characters: 1392 1500
No. of Different Words: 178 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.105 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.901 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.652 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 104 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 74 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.706 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.869 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.529 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.299 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.476 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.039 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5