Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out, while others say that we should concentrate more on problems human beings. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
We are blessed with the treasure of nature comprising fuel, water, earth, flora and fauna. Presently, animal species are at the low ebb on account of disgraceful activities of human beings. Therefore, some people claim that the prime responsibility of humans is to prevent animals from extinction by offering them safe environment. By contrast, others are more concerned about hardships of human beings. Here, I would like to account for both sides with my own perception.
Numerous points can be put down to shore up the former view. First and foremost, the role of animals to maintain the food c...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-05-04 | halleybachelor | 70 | view |
- Old people take a while to begin using new technology, such as mobile phones. Why do you think this is happening? Suggest ways to encourage them to use mobile phones and new technology for their benefit. 80
- In many countries traditional food is replaced by international fast food. This has adverse effects on families, individuals and the society. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 55
- Children today are not as fit and healthy as in the past. Discuss the causes for this situation with relevant examples and give your opinion on possible solutions. 93
- Some people think that economic development is the only way to end poverty and hunger while others believe that it is causing damage to the environment and so it should be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 96
- Some people say that success is 10 percent talent and 90 percent hard work Is hard work the key to success or is talent also important 66
Comments
offering them safe
offering them safe environment
should it be "a safe environment"?
hunters manage their livelihood by killing to predators
should it be "by killing predators"?
contribution in the financial and health prosperity
should it be "contribution to the financial and health prosperity"?
On the contrary, other's views are conflicting
should it be "on the other hand"?
They think that humans are excellent species on the earth than others
should it be "humans are superior species on the earth than others"?
sorry if I get you wrong...
for sake of man's well being
for the sake of man's well being
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 373 350
No. of Characters: 1870 1500
No. of Different Words: 229 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.395 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.013 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.719 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 130 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 65 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.217 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.116 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.609 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.243 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.473 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.045 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5