Some people think that mothers should spend most of their time raising family, and therefore the government should support them financially. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and examples based on your own experience.
Lifestyle has undergone dramatic changes over couple of decades. Presently, both genders have to step out for work to earn money to manage astronomical outlay. Therefore, family life is influenced negatively in the absence of mother. Hence, it is argued that mother should be at home to look after family and therefore supported financially by government. Here, I would like to discord with given statement.
There are numerous point to shore up my view. First and foremost, administrations of some thriving nations have to manage a hefty sum of money to facilitate people with optimum education, transportation and accommodation services. Hence, they may not have adequate funds to confer financial assistance to mothers. Moreover, the contribution of working mothers to boost the productivity at work places and development of nations is enormous. Hence, pecuniary benefits could deprive working sectors of female potential.
Further emphasizing on my point of view, some women are passionate to show their extraordinary talent who are highly educated and skillful. As a result, limiting them to home boundaries is unjustifiable by monetary aids. All of above, it is essential for females to rub shoulder with man in every walk of life to bring equality and boost self esteem especially in male domineering societies. Consequently, the idea of money endorsement appears to be useless. By contrast, others have conflicting opinions.
They claim that family lifestyle is supposed to be worse in the absence of mother. For example, neither domestic chores can be managed precisely nor children and grandparents could be taken care of. Thence, modern families are encountering various problems. Apart from it, children do not attain social etiquettes, emotional and educational support from parents due to their busiest lifestyle. More significantly, they may join some bad habits on account of less observation. For all these reasons, mothers must be supported with money so that they do not find needs to work for money.
To recapitulate, mother is the backbone of a family union. However, some other alternatives can be searched for instead of binding them with home responsibilities only.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2015-05-03 | yuukartika | 70 | view |
- Some people think that governments should provide subsidies to farmers to produce cheap healthy food. Others think that governments should tax companies producing unhealthy foods. Give your own opinion and examples. 80
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web 89
- Some people think that first impressions of an individual’s character are usually correct. Other people hesitate to judge a person on first meeting him or her, because they think first impressions can be misleading. Compare these two views. Use specific 80
- Some people think the government shouldpay for health care and education, but otherpeople claim that it is the individual‘sresponsibility. Do you agree or disagree? 90
- Nowadays many people work part or full time from home Some people say that working from home has many benefits while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Lifestyle has undergone dramatic changes over couple of decades.
The lifestyle has undergone dramatic changes over a couple of decades.
There are numerous point
There are numerous points
pecuniary benefits could deprive working sectors of female potential.
pecuniary benefits could deprive working sectors of female's potential.
pecuniary benefits could deprive working sectors of female potentially.
some women are passionate to show their extraordinary talent who are highly educated and skillful.
some women who are highly educated and skillful are passionate to show their extraordinary talent .
due to their busiest lifestyle.
due to their busiest lifestyles.
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 343 350
No. of Characters: 1799 1500
No. of Different Words: 216 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.304 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.245 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.976 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 136 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 107 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 75 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.913 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.128 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.565 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.236 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.457 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.032 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5