1) The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the cause of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
The environment is still a thorny issue. These days, there have a significant number of productions that can threaten the ecosystems. My essay is going to identify the cause of this problem and suggest a practical solution accordingly.
The increase of the goods leads to pollution environment can be attributed to two main reasons. First of all, a significant rise in pollution can cause this issue. When a large volume of people, it is obvious that consumer demand also increases. As a result, the appearance of some products can be coastal natural habitats such as plastic or soap is more popular. Admitted than these products is convenient and cheapen but we don not have ever abused it to because environment problem became more serious. The more people use these goods, the more wastes is released into the environment.
To deal with this question, the government should levy heavy taxes on the consumer good can be endangered the environment. They can be ban overexploitation of natural resources to make products as it may lead to a shortage of those resources. For instance, when an industry cuts down too many trees for excessive logging, not only causes air pollution but also leads to a natural disaster such as floods on landslides. Businesses should also use eco-friendly products like replacing plastic with paper. In addition, protecting the environment is not only a responsibility of government on politicians but also the person should participate even though it is just s small contribution. They can limit the use of disposable products like plastic bags or nylon raincoat. One important thing is that individuals should follow the government rule and have more environmentally conscious.
In summary, all the sections of society should try together to solve this head aching problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-15 | dmttmd2004 | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, may, so, still, for instance, in addition, in summary, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15306122449 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02249307523 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568027210884 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0419422444 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1176470588 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2941176471 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313054663987 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936904769941 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659798057893 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188762631584 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440734753697 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.