> **2/ Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.**
>
The opinions are divided on whether this is an advantage of the country when they host an international sports event or whether it is a drawback for this circumstance. While I understand why some people support the former view, I am still in favor of the latter.
Those who believe that the mastery of competition in most sports can bring some benefits for this country may have several arguments. From their point of view, their athletes have a clear understanding of the playing field and are well-positioned when they have been practicing repeatedly on roughly. Take a football match as an example, the soccer pitch is made of green grass, as usual, the host players know exactly where the best-defended spot or great offense is, and therefore they could receive more opportunities to win the game and score. Another possible argument is that this is a grant opportunity for this country to marketing culture, cuisine, sightseeing, and people. As far as the economy is concerned, when all people in the world has knowledge about their business, this can bring their income in particular and gross domestic product for its country.
Nevertheless, I’ll still believe that hosting international sports organizations could be disadvantages for this country may have several reasons. The first argument is that it takes a large cost to prepare and invent everything, including a stadium, vehicles, and airport. As a result, undeveloped countries would not afford to do it. Another possible idea work mentioning is that the area happening will be become polluted from emissions of vehicles and citizens could being late for work because of traffic jam. Consequently, pollution from international event sports makes people's bad health decrease in the future.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging why some people may argue that becoming the host of international sports games gives them more leverage than other countries, I still hold the belief that in this case will also contain unprofitability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | nle.hngoc | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | llrasthy J | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Kiwi | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | Kiwi | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | hi.nguyn91 | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ommercial channels or whether there are have telecast duration for both sexes. While...
^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...the opportunity to appear repeatedly on many different television channels. Another possible a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 682, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...ddition to entertainment purposes, they has representative with pride of their. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29431438127 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73871183214 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602006688963 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9730175751 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.769230769 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31166945517 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978249757983 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115247043395 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176608188484 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14347761497 0.056905535591 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.