Advertising encourages customer to buy in quantity not in quality. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that today, consumers tend to buy items with a large number due to vivid advertisements. However, from my perspective, quantity of goods is the most important, so I really disagree with this idea.
Actually, we have no doubt that promoting is a good way to increase the sale rates. A vivid-advertised product can invoke people's curiosities and helps them have more information about itself. Besides, advertisements often attach to the promotions. Those will make customers choose things whether they are good or not? That is why businessmen always advertise their products to rise quantities.
Nevertheless, ultimately, quality is the decisive factor in the sale. Goods, which are promoted but not good, just appeal to customers in the first time. They will not come back if the quality is bad.
Thus, in the competitive commercial market, to survive, companies should create quality products.
In conclusion, consumers can attract by fascinating advertisements, but quality is always the final choice for them when shopping.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
2020-01-29 | Niusha | 56 | view |
2020-01-29 | lydunhien | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, thus, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 41.998997996 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 1615.20841683 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 164.0 315.596192385 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39634146341 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 4.20363070211 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12263592911 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.737804878049 0.561755894193 131% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 506.74238477 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2347620316 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.75 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10117934756 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330255457277 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299964429995 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0410765510543 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392671860375 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.