Many people firmly believe that scheduling a foreign language program for children in the earliest days must be the first priority in this open society world. I am really in favor of this idea, due to the benefits it may bring.
First and foremost, children have a special ability to adapt new things quickly. Hence, learning other language may affect children on both their behaviors and knowledges. They would have a great opportunity to explore and exchange different cultures through speaking or either reading comics. Besides, children who learn foreign language tend to be more self-confident than those who do not take part in.
Additionally, another great advantage from this idea is time consuming. Compare to adults, children have more leisure time and so, spending a small amount of it on learning language is a smart way. Take part in outdoor activities, join in summer camp course are what almost all of language schools do nowadays and they take a key role in improving childrens' social skills.
However, early studying language plan may cause the language disorders to children. In order to reduce this bad effect, many experts state that the ideal moment for babies to absorb new language is at 7, when their mother tongue can be spoken fluently.
In short, planning an early starting program for children to approach a strange language is always an advance. Since it has both positive and negative effects, parents should pay more attention to their children' way of study.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 11
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, however, if, may, really, so, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1247.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04858299595 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53712134262 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647773279352 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3049326244 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9230769231 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173309450543 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581475901461 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334611050044 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950693970585 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218731302973 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.