All large companies should provide sports and community facilities to the local community. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is widely believed that large enterprises should construct sports and public amenities to reflect their corporate responsibilities to the local community. Although this viewpoint holds enormous benefits, I argue that governments and companies should have equal roles in providing people with such necessary facilities for several reasons which will be elucidated in this essay.
On the one hand, the compensation for industriousness and devotion from employees is one of the compelling reasons why large companies should allocate budgets to upgrading local amenities. As numerous white-collar employees are devoting their energy and maintaining their work commitment to large-scale companies, those enterprises should compensate for such devotion and conscientiousness by offering more advanced amenities for entertaining purposes, boosting job satisfaction and labour productivity. For example, Vingroup, a Vietnamese enterprise running businesses in various sectors, has constructed interconnected networks of high-quality roads and opened various gymnastics centres to residents who work for this group. As a result, those sports centres and brand-new transport networks have significantly benefited people, enhancing the quality of life of many individuals.
Nevertheless, government investment also plays an important role in improving local amenities, which enhances national prosperity. The rapid pace of urbanisation has led to overpopulation in metropolitan areas, urging the government to construct more advanced public infrastructure, including parks, schools, hospitals and sports centres to satisfy the needs of growing populations. If the government postpones the construction of such public amenities, various students cannot access education, posing a significant threat to society, such as public disorders and protests. As a result, the role of government in ensuring state-of-the-art sports and public amenities has become increasingly necessary, contributing to a more prosperous nation.
In conclusion, although some contend that building sports avenues and other amenities for residents should be the responsibility of large enterprises, I argue that such public welfare should be conducted through cooperation between the government and businesses. As enterprises join hands with the government in constructing sports and community facilities, such construction projects can be more economical and time-saving.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-07 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the UK s ageing population in 1985 and makes predictions for 2035 100
- Many people are travelling to other countries Why Is it a positive or negative development 78
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 82
- Nowadays more and more women decide to have children later in their life why Does the advantage or disadvantage 78
- In many countries today if people want to find work they have to move away from their families and friends Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...this viewpoint holds enormous benefits, I argue that governments and companies sh...
^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...he responsibility of large enterprises, I argue that such public welfare should b...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2111.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.30149253731 5.12529762239 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43960915164 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582089552239 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6282114955 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.916666667 106.682146367 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9166666667 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163980173517 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634608533002 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478359339386 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111245627251 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552792457493 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 13.0946893788 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.56 12.4159519038 158% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.