alternative resources like wind are more benefit than Fossil fuels.
agree or disagree?
Fossil fuels known as one of the most important resources of energy in worldwide. Beside this, in recent decades, use of other sources e.g: wind, solar and even nuclear energy increase strictly in many countries. I strongly believe that using of these sources have many advantages for individuals and governments, and is a positive invest.
There are several reasons for this view that alternative sources such as wind or solar are beneficial for people. In my view, the most important reason is, reduce pollution in cities, and decrease of disease among individuals. Nowadays, majority of cars as well as companies utilize of fossil fuels for energy production. emission of toxic gases from these machines like CO can have detrimental impacts on the individual’s healthy and ozone layer. The hearth problem and breath damages because of air pollution are the sample of these diseases. In addition, penetrate of ozone layer also, lead to publish of X-ray on the surface earth, that is destructive for human skin, and can become cause of skin illnesses. Alternative sources, not only, do not have any above negative effects, but also help to air pollution and do not have harmful for people. For this reason are suitable for using.
Another reason for being benefit alternative sources is, these resources are infinity and cheaper than fossil fuels. According to the witnesses of researcher, fossil fuels will finish by 2050. Therefore, the governments should find other sources for replacing it. Wind and solar are the best substitute because, they are accessible everywhere. also, they have a sufficient powerful for energy production in companies and cars. Likewise, cost of their production is much inexpensive compared to fossil fuels. We need the advance technologies and machines for drilling earth and extraction of petroleum or gas. But, for producing of solar energy, for example, we need the number of plate placed in front of the sun.
To sum up, utilization of replacing sources like wind or solar instead of fossil fuels, is an excellent idea not only for people throughout the world because of reducing illness(e.g: hearth and skin ailments), but also is beneficial for government because they are economical and available.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | msolanki | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
- Some people from poor and rural backgrounds find it difficult to get a university education. Universities have to make it easier, especially for such groups, to get into them.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The flowchart shows how concentrated apple juice is produced. 73
- The flowchart shows how concentrated apple juice is produced. 78
- Some parents say that giving expensive gifts to a child can create bad habits in him her Do you agree or disagree 81
- Nowadays more and more business meetings and business trainings are taking place online.Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Emission
... of fossil fuels for energy production. emission of toxic gases from these machines like...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 345, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...ecause, they are accessible everywhere. also, they have a sufficient powerful for en...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, likewise, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, such as, as well as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25761772853 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76485656518 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556786703601 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.283770148 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.05 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155622291657 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05041218236 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718938778642 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103495780699 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403398823119 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.