Although some countries with long working hours are economically successful, this often had some negative consequences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In some countries, the standard working hours are relatively longer than in other countries. While some people believe that long working hours helps the country to become economically strong, others opine that it has some negative effects on workers. I agree with the latter view and the reasons for my inclination are articulated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, there are several reasons why working for longer hours is not a good approach.
At the top of that is health issues. To be precise, it has a serious impact on employee health when they working constantly. It will not only increase their work stress but also make their life tiresome as they do not get time to relax or to do physical exercise. For instance, in the Uk, various studies concluded that the individuals who involve in work throughout the day without adequate rest they body conditions at a higher level of risk of diseases such as diabetes, high blood pressure and psychological illness.
On the other hand, another reason is that workers do not get enough time to spend with their family. To epitome, it has been noticed that those who spend most of the time for work have a weaker family relationship with their family because they do not spend their quality time with their children and family. Furthermore, most of the companies are seeking workers who able to work for more hours but the individuals prefer to work for fewer hours. Hence, it will increase the unemployment rate as people do not prefer to work in the restless workspace.
To conclude, although longer working hours are advantageous for developing countries, it will arduous for an employee as it will affect their relationship with their family and face some health crisis.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-03-08 | Manvir singh | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the united kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 89
- The charts below show household spending pattern in two countries between 1980 and 2008 40
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 365, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a able'.
Suggestion: who is a able
...st of the companies are seeking workers who able to work for more hours but the individu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94217687075 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61063451283 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4983405986 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.769230769 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230523672182 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886328401713 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734676862196 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14274913191 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836030517588 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 365, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a able'.
Suggestion: who is a able
...st of the companies are seeking workers who able to work for more hours but the individu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94217687075 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61063451283 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4983405986 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.769230769 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230523672182 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886328401713 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734676862196 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14274913191 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836030517588 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.