Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, every individual is equipped with a smartphone, and with the introduction of new user-friendly applications, people around the world have started using their phones for work and study, while being in their homes. Students are exposed to more professional teachers as they can reach them swiftly. This advancement in technology also cuts out the need to travel for workers. Although this is a positive development it holds a drawback too.
Teachers are the most essential part of a student's life as they can show the path to success. Advanced technology helps students reach teachers who reside in another country or the ones who are busy with their work. The need to refer a teacher at a specific time is no longer needed. I myself studied for my SAT exams online, it was convenient and easy and I could easily select a teacher with who I connected
Every working professional is required to travel to a specified location to work usually using cars or public transport. This hugely contributes to global warming as cars and buses produce carbon dioxide which is considered, one of the biggest causes of global warming. In the coming years, Many employees will shift their work online in order to reduce their carbon footprint.
Looking at a drawback, working at your home means staying in one position for a large amount of time ultimately, this could cause health issues. For example, back problems, eye strain, etc. Although they can be rectified with a little work but it is a matter of concern.
To conclude, advancements in technology are for the benefit of humans, it rectifies many hurdles from the life of a student as well as a working professional by connecting students to teachers worldwide and saving the planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | Nguyen144202 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | oanh2020 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | maidiem.1508 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | thanhbinh | 61 | view |
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uts out the need to travel for workers. Although this is a positive development it holds...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve development it holds a drawback too. Teachers are the most essential part of ...
^^^
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...achers are the most essential part of a students life as they can show the path to succe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94880546075 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76920344025 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576791808874 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4731182052 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.571428571 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151757542378 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490123667805 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370274189018 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836908590294 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337676645741 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.