Around the world, politicians are generally not trusted or often considered corrupt. Why do you think this is the case and what should politicians be doing to improve their reputation amongst their citizens?
The politician’s elections occur regularly around the globe, and often there is a change of individuals. While the local people frequently question the honesty of what they represent as their policy, I believe that if politicians could fulfil their promises, it will build up their reputation.
There are significant reasons why politicians have been stereo-typed by local people, because most of the time is due to their corruption. One of the example in China, government members and entrepreneurs collude seriously and local people have a greater awareness of those people. However, government power is extremely strong that locals cannot fight back. Another example in Australia, employees have contributed an enormous of taxes to the government and that money is not being used to achieve their campaign productivity. As a result, human thought of politicians are often keep public money to use for their relatives and friends.
Despite these reasons, there are some obvious ways can politicians do to implant their level of honest. The paramount priority action is that allowing the mass media reports openly on their activities and promises. A valid illustration of this is when collecting taxes and that money is being used to run their campaign productively, should be the aim of governance. Moreover, politicians should make realistic promises in their campaign speech which they can fulfil. For example, they may wish to decrease the unemployment rate, in this case, they should invest in creating job security and this may stimulate to enhance economic growth.
In conclusion, although there are numerous reasons that politicians are not being trusted, a plethora of methods they can improve to instill the trust.
- Around the world, politicians are generally not trusted or often considered corrupt. Why do you think this is the case and what should politicians be doing to improve their reputation amongst their citizens? 84
- with more and more people communicating via computers and mobile telephones there is a real danger that we are losing the ability to communicate with others face to face Do you agree or disagree 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they can improve to instill the trust.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40441176471 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91933063381 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599264705882 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9578124274 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.076923077 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330276664852 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107971216362 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591983610479 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187769355454 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523619786805 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.