The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.
The diagram illustrates how many billions KWH of electricity were produced and were consumed by the top ten countries during the year of 2014.
Overall, the most obvious pieces of information are that China showed its superiority over other countries which produced and used electricity at that year. In addition, the ten countries had a larger number in the production of electricity than the consumption of that, except Germany.
Moving to more detailed analysis, in 2014, China had a higher figure for electricity production and usage that was accounted for 5,398 and 5,322 each –the largest number of this sector. The second top rank was United States, which was listed at 4,099 (production) and 3,866 (consumption). These were followed by Russia, Japan, India, Canada, France, Brazil, Germany, and Korea Rep, which were ranged from 1,057 to 485,1 respectively for electricity production and from 1,038 to 449,5 successively in the usage of electricity.
Subsequently, it is clearly seen that the electricity produced had a higher level than electricity used in almost ten countries. Only did Germany have the number of consumption electricity (582.5) dominating that of electricity generated (526.6). This means that Germany lack the production of during the period.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-07-04 | sasachic10 | 56 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 56
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
- The pie chart below shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 73
- Below is the map of Canterbury town. There is a plan of building a new school in this town where two possible sites (S1 and S2) have been proposed. 67
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 1615.20841683 66% => OK
No of words: 199.0 315.596192385 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38693467337 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87169112791 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 176.041082164 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577889447236 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 506.74238477 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2443707244 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345369924619 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146144870561 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557768017099 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204001145747 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276266142984 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.