The best way to deal with issues related to traffic and transportation is to encourage people to live in cities instead of suburbs or the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In our rapid growth societies, the division of the volume of traffic systems is a concerning issue. Many people argue that encouraging people to live in the urban areas instead of the countryside or suburbs, while I totally disagree with the statement for some reasons.
First and foremost, if everyone migrates from rural areas to urban areas and settles down, it can lead to heavy traffic congestion. There are tons of vehicles in the street, especially in the rush hours, so inhabitants need to wait for a long time to move, and causes collisions and traffic accidents. Furthermore, transportation systems can not meet all citizens’ needs due to the degraded facilities, which are hard to invest in and costly to do so frequently.
In addition, rising in the number of vehicles can cause environmental issues, such as air pollution and global warming. As a result, people may suffer from serious health problems from contaminated emissions, and large amounts of carbon dioxide. For instance, Thailand ranks in the worst air quality in the world due to the color change of the Sun recently. It can be an alarm for people to lessen the volume of vehicles in the suburbs. If people do not agree to move, the governments strictly ban regulations on private vehicles to encourage them to use public transportation.
To sum up, while people, mainly residing in big cities occasionally shorten the traveling time and distance, it more often poses a high risk of overloading trains, and lower living conditions environmentally in these places. Thus, the government should consider the limitation of this suggestion; otherwise, the transport system and urban living conditions would suffer.
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast food 56
- With the development of the medica online there is no future for the radio To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Life cycle and anatomy of a lady bird 41
- An increasing number of advertisement on TV aim at children What are the effects of television advertisement SHould televison advertisements be controlled 56
- 14 2 2019 and 20 8 2022 The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15272727273 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94790919043 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629090909091 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9173250506 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.083333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177988526681 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569964767913 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640958834113 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106595834103 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647682231097 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.