Transportation infrastructure plays an inevitable role in economic and social development in many countries. In order to tackle the repercussions of traffic jams, several people believe that complementary and nonstop public transport services are likely to be the most effective solution. I partly subscribe to this theory that transport systems should be available more frequently, but being a free and twenty-four seven service seems to be unnecessary for several reasons, as we shall see.
On the one hand, the excessive number of personal vehicles is probably the primary reason causing traffic jams in many urban areas. Therefore, reducing private cars or bikes and upgrading public means of transportation in terms of quality and quantity is likely to be the best answer. We can see it in the way the public transport system, namely the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) in Singapore has served its citizens effectively and significantly reduced the number of traffic congestions in rush hours. Besides, replacing a large number of engines from personal vehicles by a better public system would tremendously reduce the air pollution, seeming to be an urgent issue in many countries.
However, traffic jams mainly happen in the busiest parts of the day when people go to work in the morning and come back home in the late afternoon, so public buses or trains are less likely to be used after those periods of time. Secondly, urban citizens are virtually off from work on weekends, hence there will be fewer vehicles heading bottlenecks simultaneously, causing traffic congestions. Moreover, having public transport served twenty-four seven without charging may put an enormous burden on government budget. It is true that people pay taxes for building the infrastructures, but the operation and labour costs are expensive and may cause financial strain if it is served complementarily.
Overall, it is true that transportation issues such as traffic jams can be tackled by upgrading public transport system, but I am convinced that it should not be served continuously and free because traffic congestions do not happen all day and people are willing to pay for tickets, as long as the prices are affordable.
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little What extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development? 78
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is to provide free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Countries（where there is high unemployment）most pupils should be offered only primary education, there is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tions in rush hours. Besides, replacing a large number of engines from personal vehicles by a bet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27195467422 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01880407129 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57223796034 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.3466241413 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.083333333 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4166666667 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192712048816 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704184886876 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506357758379 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129075251251 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426197510161 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.