The best way to increase employees' job satisfaction is to increase their salaries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that a higher salary is the factor of job pleasure. While I agree with this point of view, I do not believe that this is the most effective way to make people to be engrossed in their job.
On the one hand, there are two primary reasons why a sufficiently high salary is the most important factor in satisfying the employees. One reason is that money is the foundation of everyone’s lifestyle. For example, people always fancy buying the latest fashion, paying the bills and so on, so it is used as the motivation to the employees in work. Another reason is that employees can also compare their value to others based on their pay. People routinely try their hands in maintaining equity between the inputs they bring to their occupation and the outcomes they acquire from it. Therefore, work efficiency also bases on how suitable the buck is.
However, these aforementioned reasons can be seen as the opposite angle. Firstly, most people would accept that the work environment is the key to job satisfaction. For example, someone who is artistic is much more likely to be happy working for a low salary teaching art than earning a fortune as a merchant banker. In this case, money does not matter more the environment. Secondly, every complexity in work arises from money such as competition and yearning a higher position as well as a well-paid job. As a result, the power of money can also be a negative impact on someone who has wrong ambitions.
In conclusion, while the salary is only one consideration in creating productivity, I would argue that it may be a mistake to place too much emphasis on the salary.
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 80
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 It also predicts figures for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 62
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives. What kind of problems can this cause? What solutions can you suggest? 61
- The graph below shows the amounts spent on apparel on the Internet in the USA and Japan between 1999 and 2003 81
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts. 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76306620209 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76650663917 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0536097365 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1333333333 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0958888423159 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306419089204 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04438199354 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0623579911404 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588994050723 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.