The best way to plan a holiday is by not planning at all.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In recent times, traveling has gained significant ubiquity courtesy of the jovial experience and the health benefits it brings. As a result, a stance has been indicating that arbitrary traveling is the best medium to enjoy the journey. While this may sound appealing and adventurous, I am somewhat against this type of traveling for a host of reasons, which will be further elucidated in this essay.
To commence with, it is undeniable that traveling without a sense of expectancy may bring more memorable experiences for trip-goers. To specify, by virtue of embarking on a journey unplanned, people may have more chances to interact with the locals, which is highly probable that they could gain helpful travel knowledge and attain a reservoir of knowledge about the long existence of a tradition or the meaning behind a traditional festival there. What is more, by following their guidance, travelers might be able to see the exquisite beauty of an uncommercialized attraction or have a chance to try out scrumptious-looking traditional dishes of the place. When compared that with tour travel which individuals have to follow the planned timeline and visit tourist attractions packed with people while being stifled in the heat of the city, an unplanned trip might indeed sound better.
However, turning to the other side of the argument, making no plan for the holiday may deprive people of choosing the best options. To elaborate, when plans and arrangements are carried out before the trip, travelers can read through recommendation articles or reviews of the intended destination. This allows people to make the best choice for many facets of traveling out of a plethora of options, such as accommodations or dining establishments. To cite an example, if time is not devoted to investigating the average price tiers for the culinary delights of the travel destination, individuals may run up against the prospect of paying a stratospherically high price for a watered-down version of the actual crown jewels of the cuisine there. By shedding light on this example, it is crystal clear that a detailed plan is of fundamental importance to ensure the quality of the trip.
In conclusion, although travel without expectations and arrangements might help people to feel more adventurous, travelers may have fewer choices of staying in a fully accommodated hotel or eating delicious food at a highly recommended street vendor. All things considered, I somewhat disagree with unplanned traveling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows how much money is spent in the budget on different sectors by the UAE government in 2000 84
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 84
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 89
- Bullying is a big problem in many schools What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 78
- The plans show an office in a university in 2005 and the same office now 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...what disagree with unplanned traveling.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2725 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13306459397 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5775 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.8633140716 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.642857143 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149319604173 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590573933373 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464941303665 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878266532746 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229716315068 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.