The best way to resolve the world environmetal problems is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree ?
International experts proposed plenty ways to solve the global environmental issues. One of the solutions is increased the price of fuel that is quite useful to decrease climate changes. But I disagree that it is the best way to resolve the world environment problems.
National council should raise the taxes of fuel which help to reduce amount of the private transports. When the quantity of individual vehicles fall, this means that will drop the emissions to the atmosphere. Of course, if this is realized on the global scale, it will bring a massive result that contributes to decline the influence of greenhouse gases and global warming. In addition, the source of natural fuel is not unlimited, so increasing fuel taxes aslo devote to protecting resources and falling human dependence on them. Thus, I believe that international organizations should put pressure on countries to force them to grow fuel taxes.
However, I would agree that there are more effective ways to resolve international environment issues. Firstly, from the perspective of transport policy, the ban on individual vehicles has been adopted by many countries. For instance, Singapore is one of the most successful countries in terms of personal transportation by dramatically increasing road taxes and car import taxes. This has contributed significantly to reducing emissions to the environment and putting Singapore in the ranking of the cleanest countries in the world. Besides, the solution to develop public transport also helps the environment not only to reduce air pollution but also to reduce noise pollution. Finally, renewable energy development is also a sustainable and very effective way of addressing global environmental issues.
In conclusion, while the increase in fuel taxes is quite effective in resolving environmental problems, we still need to incorporate other solutions in our efforts to protect the earth and the future of humanity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-21 | Lê Võ Nhật Quang | 89 | view |
| 2018-03-26 | nguyenson091295 | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43234323432 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08719370265 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561056105611 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6564087387 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.733333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19690178701 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715526577693 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902988605283 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134668075475 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801795485379 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.