Numerous people argue that increasing the price of gas is the most effective measure to address the problems of the environment. While this approach can potentially reduce harmful fume rates by limiting the number of car on the roads, I maintain that a global awareness campaign would be a more practical way to address the root causes of this issue.
On the one hand, raising fuel costs might decrease the amount of carbon dioxide in cities at a certain level. In reality, vehicles release vast amounts of noxious fumes into the atmosphere every second, which makes the air more noxious and more polluted. Requiring individuals to pay more for their journeys can encourage them to rely less on their private car, ultimately leading to commuters choosing more environmentally-friendly modes of transportation, such as public transport or electric bikes. According to the Land Transport Authority, after the Singaporean government implemented a 20% increase in gas prices in 2018, there was a 2. 2% increase in daily bus ridership in the first quarter compared to the same period in 2017.
However, this measure does not fully address the underlying causes of substantial problems. Moreover, these issues can stem from various factors, including the use of plastic bags while shopping or the use of noxious chemicals in the agricultural and industrial sectors, contaminating both land and water. Therefore, the most effective approach would be to run a worldwide program to raise consumers' awareness of the importance of natural costs. Additionally, the program promotes the use of eco-friendly practices in farming and manufacturing, including reducing the consumption of harmful chemicals and adopting renewable energy sources. Sweden has been implementing sustainable farming practices, such as reduced pesticide usage and organic farming, to promote biodiversity and reduce the ecological impact of agriculture.
In conclusion, while increasing fuel prices can cut emissions to a number of extent by discouraging individuals from using private vehicles, a global awareness campaign will be a more effective measure to mitigate the underlying causes of this problem. I am also convinced that once this approach is implemented, there will be more people perceiving the importance of natural protection, contributing to the reduction of natural issues.
- Some people believe that schools are no longer necessary because students can get so much information through the Internet and study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart and table below give information about what nursing graduates did after finishing their course in the UK in 2009 84
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[5]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun extent seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much extent', 'a good deal of extent'.
Suggestion: much extent; a good deal of extent
...easing fuel prices can cut emissions to a number of extent by discouraging individuals from using ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50688705234 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17813699496 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578512396694 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.1547931544 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.785714286 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9285714286 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0875323031074 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312683974699 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415190826715 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0578719907431 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340851975662 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.