Billions of dollars are being wasted each year on space research. The money could be better used to improve conditions on earth.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Many countries are very much concerned about their successful space missions and are spending huge amount of money on different projects. But actually the number is in billions and some believe that this money can be applicable for making the lives better down on earth. This amount can be used to tackle the important issues which are faced by the people. But still we need to understand the agenda behind augmenting the space exploration and why it is becoming a hot issue among the agencies.
Several studies are indicating that in future, people are going to face numerous challenges. Firstly, there will be a massive spike in numbers regarding population around the world and it will become a major trouble to overcome. Another studies which are explaining dreadful theories are about the change in the climatic conditions. Because of pollution, it is stimulated that in coming years, the air we breathe will become toxic enough. There will be more natural disasters because of the rising water levels of oceans and rapid flooding will damage the lower grounds. Furthermore, the limited resources will be available for everyone to survive. Only to encounter the plenty problems that earth is going to face in near future, options are being searched just in case we touch a possibility of extinction.
Despite of the various reason, there are liabilities based on this matter. Many government organisations in the name of space research wants to conquer territories for Space supremacy. When it comes to the part about space war, it is diabolical to spend enormous amount of money just to get a tag for coming first rather than being visionary about the upcoming crisis.
In my opinion, exploring the unknown is not a wastage of money, it is a way to extend the human existence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ming a hot issue among the agencies. Several studies are indicating that in f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... Several studies are indicating that in future, people are going to face numerous chal...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e touch a possibility of extinction. Despite of the various reason, there are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...visionary about the upcoming crisis. In my opinion, exploring the unknown is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, regarding, so, still, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63456854978 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588628762542 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7560451375 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192177948577 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598557418547 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528930650935 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106310364222 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594539787217 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.