With advances in technology, online shopping is increasingly becoming a widespread and prevailing trend. I argue that cyber shopping is undisputedly effective with plentiful advantages regardless of a certain number of inconveniences.
Online shopping is not invariably superb but still bears visible weaknesses. Undoubtedly buying goods on the Internet does not provide shopping experiences to customers, which is an apparent strength of direct purchase. To some people, procurement is not only to seek the utilities of products, but it also offers a sense of amusement throughout the whole purchasing process, from traveling to the emporiums to trying products, along with the bustling atmosphere in shopping malls. Furthermore, counterfeit products are commonplace in the network space due to lacking direct testing. Incidents in which one receives a worse quality product than advertisements are not scarce in this approach. These significant factors, therefore, make people put e-shopping into thorough consideration before adopting it.
Online shopping, however, presents numerous advantages simultaneously to customers and retailers. Purchase on the Internet is cost savings. People can procure their willing commodities without commuting, which builds up the eventual expense of buying in general. From the perspective of retailers, be the means of an e-commerce platform, renting a high-cost location for their stores tends to be no longer essential, and the sales staff might be minimized in quantity, resulting in a significant reduction of the operating cost. In another aspect, online shopping is remarkably effective for busy people. Sitting in the office, by several effortless and swift clicks, a nine-to-five officer may accomplish her purchase, which will be delivered to her residence rapidly by Grab Food. Beyond that, the convenience of comparing prices between shops is another substantial usefulness of e-shopping.
In conclusion, online purchase is an irresistible tendency in the technological era. Albeit with the existing drawbacks, the undeniable benefits of online shopping still overshadow them.
- The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind but it could be more usefully applied How far do you agree 89
- Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment poverty and animal welfare than previous generations What is your opinion 73
- The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind but it could be more usefully applied How far do you agree 89
- The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind but it could be more usefully applied How far do you agree 89
- The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind but it could be more usefully applied How far do you agree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73870967742 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09166413065 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616129032258 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 310.0 20.2975951904 1527% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1779.0 106.682146367 1668% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 310.0 20.7667163134 1493% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 89.0 7.06120827912 1260% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100804585768 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100804585768 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621461539404 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252817579471 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 160.6 13.0946893788 1226% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -260.09 50.2224549098 -518% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 126.6 11.3001002004 1120% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 17.49 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.36 8.58950901804 284% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 9.78957915832 633% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 126.0 10.1190380762 1245% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 127.0 10.7795591182 1178% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.